The Brain Subject and
the Author of the Articles
By Robert Naeslund, 2013
Here is the first of a series of articles to be published about a topic that has been developed in secrecy, and that is known almost only to those involved and their victims. The issue is modern brain research, involving medical abuses and doctors misuse of their patients for critical experimentation. It’s about scientific progress and the price that many people have had to pay even though they never accepted to involve themselves, being unwitting or unwilling participants for a life time of remote controlled brain experiments.
My name is Robert Naeslundand the issue to be covered is in many ways one with my life, but in different aspects during varied times. From being a victim with personal experiences, I liberated myself and started to research the topic, writing a book, make reports, articles and lecturing on this hidden agenda to open up a public debate.
The following articles are not addressing my case in particular,but the subject as a whole. For me it all began in my youth, at Stockholm’s South Hospital (Södersjukhuset) when I was admitted for an operation. The surgeon implanted electrodes in my brain without my knowing and after that I was used for brain experimentation which went on for many years. I had no understanding of what I was exposed to, but on discovering the reality I began trying to prove it. No doctors in Sweden would to help me. Later I came into contact with the Swedish-American Professor Petter Aron Lindstrom at the University of California who helped me in many ways, together with other doctors at that university. He was the first one who confirming the presence of implants in my brain. (Part of his letter beside.)
From that time I gained support from several leading people in Sweden, both within media and legal sectors. Magazines wrote about my case, electronic companies detected the frequencies broadcasted from the Defense Departments Radio Station, the Red Cross acted and the Chairman of the Supreme Governmental Court, Gustav Petrén contributed by finding a hospital abroad. Swedish doctors did everything they could to prevent my case being exposed and even contacted psychiatrists whom told me that if I continued with my activities, I would be declared as mentally ill. Professors at the famous University Hospital, Karolinska Sjukhuset in Stockholm, contacted Dr Lindstrom and tried to stop his help to me. Several other leading medical doctors acted against me, only with the intention to prevent any disclosures of the crimes they themselves were committing. The government became involved, but was only interested in covering my case. For those who want to know more about this subject, which represents a scaring issue for all people when became a patient at any hospital, risks of being implanted and exploited by the biomedical researchers. Watch my lecture at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ei3zla5hS9o
WHAT IS MIND CONTROL?
By Robert Naeslund, 2013
The term associated with conspiracy theories has in fact been a 50-years old ongoing techno-political project. It was with the development of the first supercomputers, system for controlling the mind; brain and behavior was established. This was a part of the new science of cybernetics, which became public 1948 when the American professor Norbert Wiener published his book with the same title. The researchers’ project of mind control is most often classified as behavior or cognitive manipulation. Already from the beginning, more than half a century ago, it was possible to intercept thoughts, memories, and sensory functions such as sight or hearing. Cybernetics was also the first science that could not only measure and analyze what it came in contact with, but also change these processes.
But the military took over and developed it behind secrecy. They became innovator, made up the values and selected the researchers for cooperation. From the early beginning it was a debate about the issue. The scientific magazine Science had 14-pages in their 1956 November issue under the heading “Some Issues Concerning the Control of Human Behavior”, and Professor Carl R Rogers said: “We can choose to use our growing knowledge to enslave people in ways never dreamed of before, controlling them by means so carefully selected that they will perhaps never be aware of their loss of personhood”. He added the possibility for political use: “Of all the dictatorships espoused by utopists, this is the most profound, and incipient dictators might well find in this utopia a guidebook of political practice…” but mentioned the probable misuse in democratic countries.This scared many. In the USA books were published, articles written and speeches held by leading people about the danger. The threat of exploitation of humans by a remote control technology became apparent. The American professor of psychiatry Joost Meerloo, released his book “The Rape of the Mind” (1956) in which he said: “The tragic facts of political experiences in our age make it all too clear that applied psychological technique can brainwash entire nations and reduce their citizens to a kind of mindless robotism which becomes for them a normal way of living.” In 1968 Dr. Erich Fromm, the psychoanalyst and social philosopher published his book “A Revolution of Hope” and wrote: “It is not the old ghost of communism or fascism; it is a completely mechanized society where man himself became a part of the machine. “ It took 9 years until “The New York Times” had the editorial Control CIA Not Behavior (5.8. 1977) and gave their opinion: “So we must add repugnant medical experimentation to the list of horror stories emerging from the Central Intelligence Agency. It was no secret that the agency once hunted desperately for means to control human behavior…”
But the behavior technology with mind control continued. Also in all European nations people were implanted and exploited. The EU´s Ethical Board with the Swedish Professor Hermerén as chairman protested and wrote in their 2005-declaration to the EU-Commission: “Implants used for changing the identity, memory, self perception and perception of others should be forbidden”. But the Swedish military research (FOI) declares in their report of activities that their aim is to direct the cognitive functions of people for a life time: “FOI develops systems with emphasis on the interaction between people and technology. The goal is that the systems be designed that human cognitive potential, i.e. the ability to perceive, understand, and sorting information can be utilized for maximum system effect.” An implanted nightmare of this new kind will become permanent if not made public by mass media. This development can only continue as long as it takes place without public knowledge. Journalists, social activists and sensible politicians, among others, will not want to live their lives with an electronic leash attached to their brain, like a kind of cattle, any more than the rest of the population do. It has to be the responsibility of all of us to make this public if we want to live as human beings, in freedom and with human rights in the 21st century here on Earth. See the lecture: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ei3zla5hS9o
MIND CONTROL ARTICLES
by The New York TimesRobert Naeslund, 2013
When The New York Times exposed the CIA-project of behavior modification in July 1977, the General Director of the secret institution, Stanfield Turner, had to testify at the Senate hearings. On August 3, 1977, he gave an account of a CIA established network, including 80 medical universities, hospitals, and prisons together with 185 high-ranking U.S. scientists, researchers and doctors. It was mentioned that the program had begun under the Director of the CIA, Allen Dulles, in 1953. This was something Professor John C. Lilly described in his memoirs, “The Scientist”. He said that the Director in 1953 proposed that he join the CIA and participate in experiments. But he refused and the reason ha gave for this was also explained in his book: “Dr. Antoine Remond, using our technique in Paris, has demonstrated that stimulation of the brain can be applied to the human without the help of a neurosurgeon; he is doing it in his clinic. This means that anybody with the proper apparatus can carry this out on a person covertly, with no external signs that electrodes have been used on that person. I feel that if this technique gets into the hands of a secret agency, they could have a total control over a human being and be able to change his beliefs extremely quickly.” Today inject able biochips are being utilized in hospitals around the world and the issue has, with increased levels of usage become even more shrouded by secrecy and a conspiracy of silence.
During the summer of 1977 The New York Times published 30 articles about the CIA and mind control. But ten years before they’d already published a first editorial under the heading “Push-Button People” and demanding a public debate of the threat. As stated in their first editorial on mind control, 10th of April 1967, in relation to the possible political applications they mentioned: “It is quite conceivable that in some countries investigations may be under way into the possibility of using these techniques to control human beings…the mere existence of such a possibility is disturbing, and certainly merits wider public discussion and greater attention than it has received up to now.” Britain, Sweden and U.S. were among these nations.
Three years later another editorial was published. On September 19th, 1970, The New York Times editorial “Brain Wave” about the danger posed by mind control made the following point: “If George Orwell were writing a sequel to ‘1984’ today, he would probably reject as archaic the propaganda techniques for controlling people’s minds…” They suggested that: “Today, he might envisage a society in which a newborn baby’s first experience would be neurosurgery, an operation in which the child’s brain was fitted with miniaturized radio devices connected to every major center controlling reason and emotion.” They knew what was going on but had no success in bringing about a public debate on the issue. 25 years later the U.S. Senator John Glenn tried to regulate the abuse and said in a speech in the Senate: “I hope to be able to assure the people in my home state of Ohio, and those around the country, that their government is no longer conducting experiments unknown to the individual.” The situation in Europe is the same and the EU’s Ethical Board published their declaration against mind control. In 2005 they wrote “How far should we be subject to the control of such devices or by other people using these devices?” and ended with the words: “The Member States have a responsibility to create conditions for a constructive, well-informed debate in this area.” This is the most important subject in today’s world and mass media have a responsibility to open up that debate – so we must all show support for such action. Neither they nor the population in general would like to live with state chips in their brains.